Viewing body as a three dimensional form on a two dimensional surface, the oeuvre suggest the relationship between the ‘Body’ as a form of ‘Nature’ and ‘Changes (modifications)’ being a form of ‘Culture’, do not persist in the realm of co-existence, but rather they emerge as ONE.
‘ONE’ being the factual proposition of a form, creates the mobility of changes and reacting ambivalently.
With a synopsis which narrates the application of the Nature and Culture relationship that evolves within the unseen reality of dealing emotions through physical implications, the oeuvre conspicuously define the subtle vehemence of the cultural influence upon individual with the existence of nature. What went on in my mind, as I observed, is the better opportunity to see a wider pilgrim of possibilities in a variety of vernacular. Relishing in every aspect of the human nature, their endless variety, their individual foibles and peculiar habits, their innocence and their cunning, and their purity and humanity, such love for attention have to unveil, in regards to the scornful realism of the ironical society.
